Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

Tarocco OSFOT Roman

Myfonts.com

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

Tarocco OSFOT Roman

2.59/5

7668 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

Myfonts.com

License

Commercial

Date added

Nov 27 2016

Description

A classic serif font with elegant and balanced proportions. This font features elegant, classic serif styling with a balanced proportion and moderate contrast between thick and thin strokes. The characters are well-defined with a traditional serif appearance, offering a timeless and sophisticated look.
Ideal for editorial design, book covers, formal invitations, and branding projects that require a touch of sophistication.
Headlines, Body text, Logos
Balanced
Download Tarocco OSFOT Roman font.

See the font with your own text

Tarocco OSFOT Roman

Category

Serif

Italic

No

Width

Normal

Line height

Normal

Overall style

Classic

Cap height

High

Bold

No

Weight

Regular

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

Medium

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for editorial design, book covers, formal invitations, and branding projects that require a touch of sophistication.

Use case

Headlines, Body text, Logos

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for Tarocco OSFOT Roman

Palatia Regular

Free for personal use

OPTIPeach-CAP

Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for Tarocco OSFOT Roman from Adobe.com

Adobe Telugu Regular

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Adobe Gujarati Regular

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for Tarocco OSFOT Roman from MyFonts.com

Tarocco OSFOT Roman

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Tarocco OT Smallcaps

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for Tarocco OSFOT Roman from CreativeMarket.com

Carrig Text otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Carrig Basic otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

sma2787
7 minutes ago
0 replies (7 minutes ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

PerefectSchraub
52 minutes ago
0 replies (52 minutes ago)