Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

Prospect Heights JNL

Myfonts.com

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

Prospect Heights JNL

3.04/5

660 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

Myfonts.com

License

Commercial

Date added

Nov 23 2016

Description

A high-contrast, narrow serif font with a classic and elegant style. This font features tall, narrow letters with a distinct vertical emphasis. The strokes are bold with a high contrast between thick and thin lines, giving it a dramatic and elegant appearance. The characters have a classic serif style with sharp, pointed serifs.
Ideal for use in headlines, posters, and branding materials where a sophisticated and striking look is desired.
Headlines, Logos
Balanced
Download Prospect Heights JNL font.

See the font with your own text

Prospect Heights JNL

Category

Serif

Italic

No

Width

Condensed

Line height

Tall

Overall style

Classic

Cap height

High

Bold

Yes

Weight

Bold

Character spacing

Tight

Contrast

High

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for use in headlines, posters, and branding materials where a sophisticated and striking look is desired.

Use case

Headlines, Logos

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for Prospect Heights JNL

Y-Files Engraved

Free for personal use

AC Mountain

Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for Prospect Heights JNL from Adobe.com

Farmhand Regular

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Sweet Titling No. 26 Medium

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for Prospect Heights JNL from MyFonts.com

Prospect Heights JNL

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Prospect Heights Solid JNL

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for Prospect Heights JNL from CreativeMarket.com

CLNRounds Regular otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Farmhand Inline otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

suebooks
9 hours ago
0 replies (9 hours ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

14
11 hours ago
1 reply (7 hours ago)