Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

Precious Sans Two Bold Italic

Myfonts.com

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

Precious Sans Two Bold Italic

2.96/5

3216 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

Myfonts.com

License

Commercial

Date added

Nov 24 2016

Description

Bold, italic, modern sans-serif with dynamic slant. This font features a bold and italic style with a modern sans-serif design. The characters are slightly slanted, giving a dynamic and forward-moving appearance. The strokes are thick and consistent, providing a strong visual impact.
Ideal for headlines, advertising, branding, and digital media where a strong and modern presence is needed.
Headlines, Logos
Balanced
Download Precious Sans Two Bold Italic font.

See the font with your own text

Precious Sans Two Bold Italic

Category

Sans-Serif

Italic

Yes

Width

Normal

Line height

Normal

Overall style

Modern

Cap height

High

Bold

Yes

Weight

Bold

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

Low

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for headlines, advertising, branding, and digital media where a strong and modern presence is needed.

Use case

Headlines, Logos

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for Precious Sans Two Bold Italic

Route 159 Bold Italic

Free for personal use

Ubuntu Bold Italic

Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for Precious Sans Two Bold Italic from Adobe.com

Ubuntu Bold Italic

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Ubuntu Medium Italic

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for Precious Sans Two Bold Italic from MyFonts.com

Precious Sans Two Bold Italic

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for Precious Sans Two Bold Italic from CreativeMarket.com

Rival Sans Medium italic otf (500)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Yorkten otf (700)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

PerefectSchraub
2 hours ago
0 replies (2 hours ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

WalpurgisNight
7 hours ago
0 replies (7 hours ago)