Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

Forum Titling RR Old Style Figures Light

Myfonts.com

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

Forum Titling RR Old Style Figures Light

2.82/5

1934 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

Myfonts.com

License

Commercial

Date added

Dec 08 2016

Description

A classic serif font with elegant, thin strokes and traditional styling. This font features a classic serif style with elegant, thin strokes and slightly curved serifs. It has a traditional appearance, reminiscent of old-style typography, with a refined and sophisticated look.
Ideal for formal invitations, classic book covers, and elegant branding materials.
Headlines, Logos
Balanced
Download Forum Titling RR Old Style Figures Light font.

See the font with your own text

Forum Titling RR Old Style Figures Light

Category

Serif

Italic

No

Width

Normal

Line height

Normal

Overall style

Classic

Cap height

High

Bold

No

Weight

Light

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

Medium

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for formal invitations, classic book covers, and elegant branding materials.

Use case

Headlines, Logos

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for Forum Titling RR Old Style Figures Light

GoudyTwenty

Free for personal use

Cormorant SC Light

Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for Forum Titling RR Old Style Figures Light from Adobe.com

Pitchfork Medium

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Trajan Pro 3 ExtraLight

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for Forum Titling RR Old Style Figures Light from MyFonts.com

Forum Titling RR Light

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for Forum Titling RR Old Style Figures Light from CreativeMarket.com

YanaRSwashCapsI otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Yana R SwashCapsII otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

fifi2
3 hours ago
1 reply (3 hours ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

JohnnyPie77
4 hours ago
1 reply (3 hours ago)