Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

FF Oneleigh OT Bold

Myfonts.com

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

FF Oneleigh OT Bold

2.94/5

4238 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

Myfonts.com

License

Commercial

Date added

Dec 12 2016

Description

A bold, classic serif font with strong, elegant strokes. This font features elegant, classic serif characters with a bold weight. The strokes are well-defined, providing a strong presence. The uppercase letters are tall and commanding, while the lowercase letters maintain a balanced and readable form. The numerals and special characters are consistent with the overall style, offering a cohesive look.
Ideal for book covers, formal invitations, branding, and editorial design.
Headlines, Logos, Editorial design
Balanced
Download FF Oneleigh OT Bold font.

See the font with your own text

FF Oneleigh OT Bold

Category

Serif

Italic

No

Width

Normal

Line height

Normal

Overall style

Classic

Cap height

High

Bold

Yes

Weight

Bold

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

High

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for book covers, formal invitations, branding, and editorial design.

Use case

Headlines, Logos, Editorial design

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for FF Oneleigh OT Bold

Riven: The Font [v3.0] Free for personal use
IndiraK Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for FF Oneleigh OT Bold from Adobe.com

Village Titling Bold $ Commercial > Adobe.com
Village Bold $ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for FF Oneleigh OT Bold from MyFonts.com

FF Oneleigh Pro Bold $ Commercial > MyFonts.com
FF Oneleigh OT Bold $ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for FF Oneleigh OT Bold from CreativeMarket.com

Hermann SemiBold otf (600) $ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com
Perpetua ttf (400) $ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

AthenaTT
14 hours ago
0 replies (14 hours ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

Malikasad
16 hours ago
0 replies (16 hours ago)