Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

FF Mark Pro Book Italic

Myfonts.com

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

FF Mark Pro Book Italic

2.76/5

512 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

Myfonts.com

License

Commercial

Date added

Nov 25 2016

Description

A modern, italic sans-serif font with a sleek and professional look. This is a sleek and modern sans-serif typeface with a clean, italic style. It features smooth curves and a slightly condensed form, providing a contemporary and professional appearance.
Ideal for branding, advertising, and editorial design projects that require a modern and clean aesthetic.
Headlines, Body text, Logos
Balanced
Download FF Mark Pro Book Italic font.

See the font with your own text

FF Mark Pro Book Italic

Category

Sans-Serif

Italic

Yes

Width

Condensed

Line height

Normal

Overall style

Modern

Cap height

High

Bold

No

Weight

Regular

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

Low

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for branding, advertising, and editorial design projects that require a modern and clean aesthetic.

Use case

Headlines, Body text, Logos

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for FF Mark Pro Book Italic

Montserrat Medium Italic

Free for personal use

Readiness Italic

Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for FF Mark Pro Book Italic from Adobe.com

Graphie Italic

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Graphie Book Italic

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for FF Mark Pro Book Italic from MyFonts.com

FF Mark Pro Book Italic

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

FF Mark OT Book Italic

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for FF Mark Pro Book Italic from CreativeMarket.com

Graphie Book Italic otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

ArtegraSoft-RegularItalic otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

JUNAID123
23 minutes ago
0 replies (23 minutes ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

ShamoonArtist
29 minutes ago
0 replies (29 minutes ago)