Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

Core Sans NR 17 Cond Thin Italic

Myfonts.com

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

Core Sans NR 17 Cond Thin Italic

2.62/5

91 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

Myfonts.com

License

Commercial

Date added

Nov 25 2016

Description

A thin, italic, condensed sans-serif font with a modern aesthetic. This font features a clean, modern sans-serif style with a thin weight and italic slant. The characters are condensed, giving it a sleek and elegant appearance. The design is minimalistic, with smooth curves and straight lines, making it suitable for contemporary design projects.
Ideal for fashion magazines, modern branding, sleek website headers, and minimalist posters.
Headlines, Logos
Balanced
Download Core Sans NR 17 Cond Thin Italic font. for PSO

See the font with your own text

Core Sans NR 17 Cond Thin Italic

Category

Sans-Serif

Italic

Yes

Width

Condensed

Line height

Tall

Overall style

Modern

Cap height

High

Bold

No

Weight

Light

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

Low

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for fashion magazines, modern branding, sleek website headers, and minimalist posters.

Use case

Headlines, Logos

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for Core Sans NR 17 Cond Thin Italic

Similar Fonts for Core Sans NR 17 Cond Thin Italic from Adobe.com

ApparatExtraCond Thin Italic

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

ApparatCond Thin Italic

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for Core Sans NR 17 Cond Thin Italic from MyFonts.com

Core Sans N 17 Cn Thin Italic

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for Core Sans NR 17 Cond Thin Italic from CreativeMarket.com

Rockeby Condensed Light Italic otf (300)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Delfino Thin Italic otf (100)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

PerefectSchraub
6 hours ago
1 reply (2 hours ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

Tabatini
11 hours ago
1 reply (48 minutes ago)