Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

Typewriter Spool RUF Bold otf (700)

CreativeMarket

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

Typewriter Spool RUF Bold otf (700)

2.88/5

11768 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

CreativeMarket

License

Commercial

Date added

Jan 31 2022

Description

Bold, textured typewriter-style font with a vintage feel. This font mimics the classic typewriter style with a bold, textured appearance. Each character features a slightly rough edge, reminiscent of ink on paper, providing a vintage and mechanical feel.
Ideal for retro-themed designs, typewriter art, vintage posters, and creative writing projects.
Headlines, Logos, Display text
Balanced
Download Typewriter Spool RUF Bold otf (700) font. Typewriter Spool RUF Bold otf (700) by

See the font with your own text

Typewriter Spool RUF Bold otf (700)

Category

Monospaced

Italic

No

Width

Normal

Line height

Normal

Overall style

Vintage

Cap height

High

Bold

Yes

Weight

Bold

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

Low

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for retro-themed designs, typewriter art, vintage posters, and creative writing projects.

Use case

Headlines, Logos, Display text

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for Typewriter Spool RUF Bold otf (700)

zai Triumph Typewriter

Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for Typewriter Spool RUF Bold otf (700) from Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for Typewriter Spool RUF Bold otf (700) from MyFonts.com

Typewriter Serial Medium

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

FF Elementa Pro Bold

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for Typewriter Spool RUF Bold otf (700) from CreativeMarket.com

Typewriter Spool CLN SemiBold otf (600)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Typewriter Spool RUF Bold otf (700)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

berkahundangan
5 hours ago
0 replies (5 hours ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

PerefectSchraub
13 hours ago
0 replies (13 hours ago)