Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

Slippery-RegularItalic otf (400)

CreativeMarket

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

Slippery-RegularItalic otf (400)

2.81/5

3237 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

CreativeMarket

License

Commercial

Date added

Dec 06 2020

Description

Elegant italic font with smooth curves and consistent stroke width. This font features a classic italic style with smooth, flowing curves and a slight slant, giving it an elegant and sophisticated appearance. The characters are well-proportioned, with a consistent stroke width that enhances readability.
Ideal for formal invitations, elegant branding, and sophisticated editorial design.
Headlines, Body text, Logos
Balanced
Download Slippery-RegularItalic otf (400) font. Slippery-RegularItalic otf (400) by ekobimantara

See the font with your own text

Slippery-RegularItalic otf (400)

Category

Serif

Italic

Yes

Width

Normal

Line height

Normal

Overall style

Classic

Cap height

High

Bold

No

Weight

Regular

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

Medium

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for formal invitations, elegant branding, and sophisticated editorial design.

Use case

Headlines, Body text, Logos

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for Slippery-RegularItalic otf (400)

Similar Fonts for Slippery-RegularItalic otf (400) from Adobe.com

Eskorte Latin Italic

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for Slippery-RegularItalic otf (400) from MyFonts.com

Slippery Regular Italic

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Slippery Medium Italic

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for Slippery-RegularItalic otf (400) from CreativeMarket.com

Slippery-RegularItalic otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Slippery Medium Italic otf (500)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

PerefectSchraub
4 hours ago
0 replies (4 hours ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

PerefectSchraub
13 hours ago
0 replies (13 hours ago)