Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

Silk RemingtonBold otf (700)

CreativeMarket

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

Silk RemingtonBold otf (700)

3.08/5

10214 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

CreativeMarket

License

Commercial

Date added

Jul 15 2017

Description

A bold, vintage slab serif font with a typewriter style. This font features bold, slab serif characters with a vintage typewriter aesthetic. The letters have a strong presence with thick strokes and rounded edges, giving them a slightly distressed look. The uppercase and lowercase letters maintain a consistent style, and the numerals are equally bold and prominent.
Ideal for retro-themed designs, posters, branding, and editorial headlines.
Headlines, Logos
Balanced
Download Silk RemingtonBold otf (700) font. Silk RemingtonBold otf (700) by jadugar

See the font with your own text

Silk RemingtonBold otf (700)

Category

Slab Serif

Italic

No

Width

Normal

Line height

Normal

Overall style

Vintage

Cap height

High

Bold

Yes

Weight

Bold

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

Low

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for retro-themed designs, posters, branding, and editorial headlines.

Use case

Headlines, Logos

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for Silk RemingtonBold otf (700)

NeoBulletin Bold Free for personal use
NeoBulletin Trash Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for Silk RemingtonBold otf (700) from Adobe.com

Typeka Bold $ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for Silk RemingtonBold otf (700) from MyFonts.com

Silk Remington Pro One $ Commercial > MyFonts.com
Silk Remington Pro Three $ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for Silk RemingtonBold otf (700) from CreativeMarket.com

Silk RemingtonBold otf (700) $ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com
Silk Remington One ttf (400) $ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

GALLGUT
5 hours ago
0 replies (5 hours ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

Arzathol
6 hours ago
0 replies (6 hours ago)