Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

Silk Fleur Regular otf (400)

CreativeMarket

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

Silk Fleur Regular otf (400)

2.88/5

1444 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

CreativeMarket

License

Commercial

Date added

Nov 30 2019

Description

Elegant, flowing script with a handwritten style. This font features elegant, flowing script with a handwritten style. The characters are connected, giving it a fluid and natural appearance. It has a modern yet classic feel, suitable for sophisticated designs.
Ideal for wedding invitations, greeting cards, and elegant branding.
Logos, Invitations, Decorative text
Balanced
Download Silk Fleur Regular otf (400) font. Silk Fleur Regular otf (400) by flipandstyle

See the font with your own text

Silk Fleur Regular otf (400)

Category

Script

Italic

Yes

Width

Normal

Line height

Tall

Overall style

Modern

Cap height

High

Bold

No

Weight

Regular

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

Medium

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for wedding invitations, greeting cards, and elegant branding.

Use case

Logos, Invitations, Decorative text

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for Silk Fleur Regular otf (400)

High Spirited

Free for personal use

Mighty River

Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for Silk Fleur Regular otf (400) from Adobe.com

Miss Packgope Regular

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Miss Stanfort Regular

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for Silk Fleur Regular otf (400) from MyFonts.com

Modernline Regular

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Handsta Signature Regular

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for Silk Fleur Regular otf (400) from CreativeMarket.com

Silk Fleur Regular otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Rockidate otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

Thungo
3 hours ago
0 replies (3 hours ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

PerefectSchraub
6 hours ago
0 replies (6 hours ago)