Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

Highest Regular otf (400)

CreativeMarket

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

Highest Regular otf (400)

3.05/5

149 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

CreativeMarket

License

Commercial

Date added

Mar 31 2024

Description

Elegant script font with decorative swashes. This font features elegant, flowing script with elaborate swashes and flourishes, giving it a sophisticated and decorative appearance. The characters are connected, with a smooth and fluid style that mimics handwritten calligraphy.
Ideal for wedding invitations, greeting cards, and elegant branding projects.
Logos, Invitations, Decorative text
High
Download Highest Regular otf (400) font. Highest Regular otf (400) by John_London

See the font with your own text

Highest Regular otf (400)

Category

Script

Italic

No

Width

Normal

Line height

Tall

Overall style

Decorative

Cap height

High

Bold

No

Weight

Regular

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

High

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for wedding invitations, greeting cards, and elegant branding projects.

Use case

Logos, Invitations, Decorative text

Ascender descender ratio

High

Similar Free Fonts for Highest Regular otf (400)

Betterday Script [Demo]

Free for personal use

West Houston Demo

Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for Highest Regular otf (400) from Adobe.com

LiebeGerda Bold

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Grafolita Script Regular

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for Highest Regular otf (400) from MyFonts.com

Betterday Script Regular

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Winter Belly

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for Highest Regular otf (400) from CreativeMarket.com

Highest otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Highest Regular otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

PerefectSchraub
6 hours ago
1 reply (2 hours ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

Tabatini
11 hours ago
1 reply (51 minutes ago)