Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

Diamonds are Forever-Italic Bold Italic otf (700)

CreativeMarket

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

Diamonds are Forever-Italic Bold Italic otf (700)

2.99/5

2390 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

CreativeMarket

License

Commercial

Date added

Apr 19 2020

Description

Bold, italic, and angular with a modern geometric style. This font features a bold and italic style with a modern, angular design. The characters are slightly condensed with a unique, geometric flair, making it stand out. The strokes are thick, providing a strong visual impact.
Ideal for branding, posters, and headlines that require a bold statement.
Headlines, Logos
Balanced
Download Diamonds are Forever-Italic Bold Italic otf (700) font. Diamonds are Forever-Italic Bold Italic otf (700) by weknow

See the font with your own text

Diamonds are Forever-Italic Bold Italic otf (700)

Category

Decorative/Display

Italic

Yes

Width

Condensed

Line height

Normal

Overall style

Modern

Cap height

High

Bold

Yes

Weight

Bold

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

Low

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for branding, posters, and headlines that require a bold statement.

Use case

Headlines, Logos

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for Diamonds are Forever-Italic Bold Italic otf (700)

Similar Fonts for Diamonds are Forever-Italic Bold Italic otf (700) from Adobe.com

HelloFont ID LieFeng Regular

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Heimat Mono Bold Italic

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for Diamonds are Forever-Italic Bold Italic otf (700) from MyFonts.com

PeterPierre Extra Bold Oblique

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Calculus LCDOblique

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for Diamonds are Forever-Italic Bold Italic otf (700) from CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

Summer
2 hours ago
0 replies (2 hours ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

charmingst
8 hours ago
1 reply (6 hours ago)