Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

BeautifulNostalgia-Regular otf (400)

CreativeMarket

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

BeautifulNostalgia-Regular otf (400)

2.86/5

2295 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

CreativeMarket

License

Commercial

Date added

May 11 2023

Description

Elegant serif font with high contrast and sharp serifs. This font features elegant, classic serif styling with high contrast between thick and thin strokes. The characters are well-defined with sharp serifs, giving it a sophisticated and timeless appearance.
Ideal for editorial design, book covers, and luxury branding.
Headlines, Body text
Balanced
Download BeautifulNostalgia-Regular otf (400) font. BeautifulNostalgia-Regular otf (400) by

See the font with your own text

BeautifulNostalgia-Regular otf (400)

Category

Serif

Italic

No

Width

Normal

Line height

Normal

Overall style

Classic

Cap height

High

Bold

No

Weight

Regular

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

High

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for editorial design, book covers, and luxury branding.

Use case

Headlines, Body text

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for BeautifulNostalgia-Regular otf (400)

Renzo

Free for personal use

Caladea Regular

Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for BeautifulNostalgia-Regular otf (400) from Adobe.com

AB Togetsukanteiryu Regular

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

AB Hieros Regular Regular

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for BeautifulNostalgia-Regular otf (400) from MyFonts.com

Pulchra Desiderio Regular

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Century Schoolbook

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for BeautifulNostalgia-Regular otf (400) from CreativeMarket.com

BeautifulNostalgia-Regular otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Century ttf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

screenedeffects
1 hour ago
1 reply (27 minutes ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

jordevi
2 hours ago
0 replies (2 hours ago)