Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

Natalya Monoline Bold

YouWorkForThem.com

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

Natalya Monoline Bold

3.01/5

2400 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

YouWorkForThem.com

License

Commercial

Date added

Aug 12 2010

Description

A bold, monoline script font with elegant, flowing lines. This elegant script font features smooth, flowing lines with a monoline structure. It has a bold weight, giving it a strong presence while maintaining a delicate, handwritten appearance. The characters are connected, enhancing its cursive style.
Ideal for wedding invitations, greeting cards, and elegant branding projects.
Logos, Invitations, Decorative Text
Balanced
Download Natalya Monoline Bold font. YouWorkForThem.com

See the font with your own text

Natalya Monoline Bold

Category

Script

Italic

No

Width

Normal

Line height

Normal

Overall style

Elegant, Handwritten

Cap height

High

Bold

Yes

Weight

Bold

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

Low

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for wedding invitations, greeting cards, and elegant branding projects.

Use case

Logos, Invitations, Decorative Text

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for Natalya Monoline Bold

Hometown Script Free Free for personal use
curlyJoe Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for Natalya Monoline Bold from Adobe.com

Delaney Semibold $ Commercial > Adobe.com
FenwayParkJF Regular $ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for Natalya Monoline Bold from MyFonts.com

Natalya Monoline Bold $ Commercial > MyFonts.com
Natalya Monoline Regular $ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for Natalya Monoline Bold from CreativeMarket.com

Natalya Monoline Bold otf (700) $ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com
Natalya Monoline Black otf (900) $ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

PerefectSchraub
2 hours ago
0 replies (2 hours ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

Ezew
3 hours ago
2 replies (3 hours ago)