Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

LTC Garamont Text Italic

Myfonts.com

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

LTC Garamont Text Italic

2.71/5

1846 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

Myfonts.com

License

Commercial

Date added

Dec 06 2016

Description

Elegant italic serif font with a classic and sophisticated style. This font features elegant, flowing italic characters with a classic serif design. The strokes are slightly slanted, giving it a sophisticated and timeless appearance. The serifs are pronounced, adding to its traditional style.
Ideal for formal invitations, elegant branding, classic book covers, and sophisticated editorial design.
Headlines, Body text, Logos
Balanced
Download LTC Garamont Text Italic font.

See the font with your own text

LTC Garamont Text Italic

Category

Serif

Italic

Yes

Width

Normal

Line height

Normal

Overall style

Classic

Cap height

High

Bold

No

Weight

Regular

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

Medium

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for formal invitations, elegant branding, classic book covers, and sophisticated editorial design.

Use case

Headlines, Body text, Logos

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for LTC Garamont Text Italic

OPTIGaramondOld-Italic

Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for LTC Garamont Text Italic from Adobe.com

GaramondFBText LightItal

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Garamond ATF Subhead Italic

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for LTC Garamont Text Italic from MyFonts.com

LTC Garamont Display Italic

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

LTC Garamont Display Italic OSF

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for LTC Garamont Text Italic from CreativeMarket.com

KirimomiSwash Italic otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Archive Garamond Pro Italic otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Solved

bojanasatara
32 minutes ago
0 replies (32 minutes ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

GALLGUT
35 minutes ago
0 replies (35 minutes ago)