Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

LTC Garamont Pro Display

Myfonts.com

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

LTC Garamont Pro Display

2.82/5

4603 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

Myfonts.com

License

Commercial

Date added

Dec 06 2016

Description

A classic serif font with elegant and refined strokes. This font features elegant, classic serif characters with a refined and sophisticated appearance. The strokes are well-defined with moderate contrast, giving it a timeless and professional look.
Ideal for editorial design, book covers, formal invitations, and branding projects that require a touch of sophistication.
Headlines, Body text, Logos
Balanced
Download LTC Garamont Pro Display font.

See the font with your own text

LTC Garamont Pro Display

Category

Serif

Italic

No

Width

Normal

Line height

Normal

Overall style

Classic

Cap height

High

Bold

No

Weight

Regular

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

Medium

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for editorial design, book covers, formal invitations, and branding projects that require a touch of sophistication.

Use case

Headlines, Body text, Logos

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for LTC Garamont Pro Display

EB Garamond Regular

Free for personal use

FlankerGriffo

Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for LTC Garamont Pro Display from Adobe.com

EB Garamond Regular

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Brigade Light

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for LTC Garamont Pro Display from MyFonts.com

LTC Garamont Display

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

LTC Garamont Display OSF

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for LTC Garamont Pro Display from CreativeMarket.com

Garrety Regular otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Fabello Thin otf (100)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

PerefectSchraub
3 hours ago
0 replies (3 hours ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

handeworke
4 hours ago
0 replies (4 hours ago)