Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

Special Elite Pro Regular

FontSpring.com

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

Special Elite Pro Regular

4.09/5

17393 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

FontSpring.com

License

Commercial

Date added

Dec 19 2016

Description

A vintage typewriter-style font with a distressed look. This font features a typewriter-style design with a vintage, distressed appearance. The characters have irregular edges and a slightly uneven baseline, giving it an authentic, old-school typewriter feel.
Ideal for retro-themed designs, vintage posters, and projects requiring a typewriter aesthetic.
Headlines, Logos
Balanced
Download Special Elite Pro Regular font. Special Elite Pro Regular by Stiggy & Sands

See the font with your own text

Special Elite Pro Regular

Category

Decorative/Display

Italic

No

Width

Normal

Line height

Normal

Overall style

Vintage

Cap height

High

Bold

No

Weight

Regular

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

Low

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for retro-themed designs, vintage posters, and projects requiring a typewriter aesthetic.

Use case

Headlines, Logos

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for Special Elite Pro Regular

Special Elite

Free for personal use

Profaisal-Elite-Tahreer

Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for Special Elite Pro Regular from Adobe.com

JohnDoe Bold

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Kiwi Maru Medium

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for Special Elite Pro Regular from MyFonts.com

Special Elite Pro

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Techno Script EF

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for Special Elite Pro Regular from CreativeMarket.com

Special Elite Pro Regular otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Merchant Ledger Thin otf (100)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

fifi2
1 hour ago
1 reply (1 hour ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

JohnnyPie77
2 hours ago
1 reply (51 minutes ago)