Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

Revival565 BT Bold Italic

FontSpring.com

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

Revival565 BT Bold Italic

2.97/5

4248 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

FontSpring.com

License

Commercial

Date added

Dec 19 2016

Description

A bold, italic serif font with a classic and elegant style. This font features a classic serif style with elegant curves and a slanted italic posture. The characters are bold, providing a strong presence, while maintaining a refined and sophisticated look. The serifs are pronounced, adding to the traditional aesthetic.
Ideal for formal invitations, branding, editorial design, and luxury product packaging.
Headlines, Logos
Balanced
Download Revival565 BT Bold Italic font. Revival565 BT Bold Italic by ParaType

See the font with your own text

Revival565 BT Bold Italic

Category

Serif

Italic

Yes

Width

Normal

Line height

Normal

Overall style

Classic

Cap height

High

Bold

Yes

Weight

Bold

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

High

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for formal invitations, branding, editorial design, and luxury product packaging.

Use case

Headlines, Logos

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for Revival565 BT Bold Italic

VenturisADF-BoldItalic Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for Revival565 BT Bold Italic from Adobe.com

Pollen Bold Italic $ Commercial > Adobe.com
Pliego SemiBold Italic $ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for Revival565 BT Bold Italic from MyFonts.com

Revival 565 BT Bold Italic $ Commercial > MyFonts.com
Revival 565 Bold Italic $ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for Revival565 BT Bold Italic from CreativeMarket.com

Austera Text Demibold Italic otf (600) $ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com
Austera Text otf (700) $ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

RomeoRetz
1 hour ago
0 replies (1 hour ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

Anagra
5 hours ago
0 replies (5 hours ago)