Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

Marble Cutter JNL Regular

FontSpring.com

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

Marble Cutter JNL Regular

3.05/5

3134 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

FontSpring.com

License

Commercial

Date added

Dec 17 2016

Description

A modern, geometric font with rounded edges and uniform strokes. This font features a clean, geometric design with rounded edges and uniform stroke widths. The characters are evenly spaced, providing a balanced and modern appearance. The numerals and special characters maintain the same stylistic features, ensuring consistency across all glyphs.
Ideal for branding, signage, and modern digital interfaces.
Headlines, Logos, Signage
Balanced
Download Marble Cutter JNL Regular font. Marble Cutter JNL Regular by Jeff Levine Fonts

See the font with your own text

Marble Cutter JNL Regular

Category

Sans-Serif

Italic

No

Width

Normal

Line height

Normal

Overall style

Modern

Cap height

High

Bold

No

Weight

Regular

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

Low

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for branding, signage, and modern digital interfaces.

Use case

Headlines, Logos, Signage

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for Marble Cutter JNL Regular

DKColiseu

Free for personal use

Basil Gothic NBP Regular

Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for Marble Cutter JNL Regular from Adobe.com

Omnium Tagline Medium

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Latinaires Caps

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for Marble Cutter JNL Regular from MyFonts.com

Marble Cutter JNL

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Coliseu

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for Marble Cutter JNL Regular from CreativeMarket.com

Bronson Handy otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Abariya Free Sans otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Solved

gonn
3 hours ago
1 reply (1 hour ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

PerefectSchraub
16 hours ago
1 reply (53 minutes ago)