Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

Editorial Comment JNL Regular

FontSpring.com

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

Editorial Comment JNL Regular

2.90/5

8779 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

FontSpring.com

License

Commercial

Date added

Dec 15 2016

Description

A bold, condensed font with uniform stroke width. This font features bold, elongated characters with a strong vertical emphasis. The strokes are consistent in width, giving it a uniform appearance. The letters are tall and narrow, contributing to a condensed look.
Ideal for editorial headlines, posters, and signage where a strong impact is needed.
Headlines, Logos
Other
Download Editorial Comment JNL Regular font. Editorial Comment JNL Regular by Jeff Levine Fonts

See the font with your own text

Editorial Comment JNL Regular

Category

Sans-Serif

Italic

No

Width

Condensed

Line height

Short

Overall style

Modern

Cap height

High

Bold

Yes

Weight

Bold

Character spacing

Tight

Contrast

Low

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for editorial headlines, posters, and signage where a strong impact is needed.

Use case

Headlines, Logos

Ascender descender ratio

Other

Similar Free Fonts for Editorial Comment JNL Regular

Ranahan

Free for personal use

Rainbow

Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for Editorial Comment JNL Regular from Adobe.com

Bourbon Regular

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Abolition Regular

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for Editorial Comment JNL Regular from MyFonts.com

Editorial Comment JNL

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

MPI Gothic Extra Condensed

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for Editorial Comment JNL Regular from CreativeMarket.com

Cast Iron Condensed Rounded otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Scarlett otf (700)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

PerefectSchraub
3 hours ago
0 replies (3 hours ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

Tabatini
8 hours ago
0 replies (8 hours ago)