Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

Typewriter Spool SFT Extended Semibold Italic

FontBros

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

Typewriter Spool SFT Extended Semibold Italic

Publisher

FontBros

License

Commercial

Date added

Sep 21 2024

Description

A semi-bold, italic, monospaced typewriter-style font with extended width. This font features a classic typewriter style with a modern twist. It has a semi-bold weight and italic slant, giving it a unique and stylish appearance. The characters are monospaced, providing a uniform look, and the extended width adds a touch of elegance.
Ideal for vintage-themed designs, coding projects, or any creative work requiring a typewriter aesthetic.
Headlines, Coding, Creative projects
Balanced
Download Typewriter Spool SFT Extended Semibold Italic font. Typewriter Spool SFT Extended Semibold Italic by

See the font with your own text

Typewriter Spool SFT Extended Semibold Italic

Category

Monospaced

Italic

Yes

Width

Expanded

Line height

Normal

Overall style

Vintage

Cap height

High

Bold

Yes

Weight

Bold

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

Medium

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for vintage-themed designs, coding projects, or any creative work requiring a typewriter aesthetic.

Use case

Headlines, Coding, Creative projects

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for Typewriter Spool SFT Extended Semibold Italic

Similar Fonts for Typewriter Spool SFT Extended Semibold Italic from Adobe.com

Sizmo Line Pro Bold

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Sizmo Pro Bold

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for Typewriter Spool SFT Extended Semibold Italic from MyFonts.com

ASM UD

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Standard Typewriter Underscore

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for Typewriter Spool SFT Extended Semibold Italic from CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

TanasiGrafix
9 hours ago
0 replies (9 hours ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

vahineus
16 hours ago
1 reply (13 hours ago)