Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

Magisha Signature Regular otf (400)

CreativeMarket

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

Magisha Signature Regular otf (400)

Publisher

CreativeMarket

License

Commercial

Date added

Nov 19 2024

Description

A cursive, handwritten-style font with a flowing and elegant appearance. This font features a flowing, cursive style with a handwritten appearance. The letters are connected, giving it a natural and personal touch. It has a casual elegance, suitable for creative and artistic projects.
Ideal for wedding invitations, greeting cards, personal branding, and artistic projects.
Logos, Invitations, Personal Branding
Balanced
Download Magisha Signature Regular otf (400) font. Magisha Signature Regular otf (400) by executypeStudio

See the font with your own text

Magisha Signature Regular otf (400)

Category

Handwritten

Italic

No

Width

Normal

Line height

Tall

Overall style

Decorative

Cap height

High

Bold

No

Weight

Regular

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

Low

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for wedding invitations, greeting cards, personal branding, and artistic projects.

Use case

Logos, Invitations, Personal Branding

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for Magisha Signature Regular otf (400)

Similar Fonts for Magisha Signature Regular otf (400) from Adobe.com

Neonoir Slim

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Zooja Light Pro Regular

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for Magisha Signature Regular otf (400) from MyFonts.com

Shorthair Script

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Madrutype Signature Regular

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for Magisha Signature Regular otf (400) from CreativeMarket.com

Sabita otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Fontbox Deliciously otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

ctprez15
21 minutes ago
0 replies (21 minutes ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

ctprez15
29 minutes ago
0 replies (29 minutes ago)