Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

AquillandSans-Bold otf (700)

CreativeMarket

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

AquillandSans-Bold otf (700)

2.66/5

3543 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

CreativeMarket

License

Commercial

Date added

Dec 07 2020

Description

Bold, modern sans-serif font with clean lines and uniform width. This font features bold, clean lines with a modern sans-serif style. The characters are uniform in width, providing a consistent and structured appearance. The design is straightforward, with minimal decorative elements, making it highly readable.
Ideal for headlines, posters, branding, and advertising materials.
Headlines, Logos
Balanced
Download AquillandSans-Bold otf (700) font. AquillandSans-Bold otf (700) by

See the font with your own text

AquillandSans-Bold otf (700)

Category

Sans-Serif

Italic

No

Width

Normal

Line height

Normal

Overall style

Modern

Cap height

High

Bold

Yes

Weight

Bold

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

Low

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for headlines, posters, branding, and advertising materials.

Use case

Headlines, Logos

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for AquillandSans-Bold otf (700)

LMS A Berry Nice Font Free for personal use
BlueSkies Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for AquillandSans-Bold otf (700) from Adobe.com

Pepperwood Std Regular $ Commercial > Adobe.com
Pepperwood Std Fill $ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for AquillandSans-Bold otf (700) from MyFonts.com

Nosara XtraOutline $ Commercial > MyFonts.com
Nosara XtraFill $ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for AquillandSans-Bold otf (700) from CreativeMarket.com

calligraphic font 3 otf (400) $ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com
MFC Capulet Monogram One otf (400) $ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

joedoeus
2 hours ago
1 reply (41 minutes ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

marcelooliveira
6 hours ago
1 reply (44 minutes ago)