Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

ThoseGlitch-Regular

from Creative Fabrica

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

ThoseGlitch-Regular

3.03/5

3507 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

from Creative Fabrica

License

Commercial

Date added

Oct 03 2022

Description

A bold, glitch-style font with digital distortion. This font features a bold, glitchy aesthetic with a digital distortion effect across all characters. The letters are uppercase and have a strong, impactful presence, making them ideal for attention-grabbing designs.
Ideal for digital art, video game graphics, tech-themed posters, and modern branding.
Headlines, Logos, Posters
Balanced
Download ThoseGlitch-Regular font. ThoseGlitch-Regular by Copyright (c) 2022 by 177Studio.com. All rights reserved.

See the font with your own text

ThoseGlitch-Regular

Category

Decorative/Display

Italic

No

Width

Normal

Line height

Normal

Overall style

Modern, Digital

Cap height

High

Bold

Yes

Weight

Bold

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

Low

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for digital art, video game graphics, tech-themed posters, and modern branding.

Use case

Headlines, Logos, Posters

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for ThoseGlitch-Regular

Jodido&Noble Free for personal use
SEPIA Personal Use Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for ThoseGlitch-Regular from Adobe.com

Peckham Press Regular $ Commercial > Adobe.com
Sweet Gothic Serif Bold $ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for ThoseGlitch-Regular from MyFonts.com

Bonega Black $ Commercial > MyFonts.com
Sistine Black $ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for ThoseGlitch-Regular from CreativeMarket.com

ThoseGlitch-Regular otf (400) $ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com
Moister-Sans otf (700) $ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

14
10 minutes ago
0 replies (10 minutes ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

carlaknupp021
17 minutes ago
0 replies (17 minutes ago)