Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

Postmark-Rough

from Creative Fabrica

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

Postmark-Rough

3.10/5

21626 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

from Creative Fabrica

License

Commercial

Date added

Apr 24 2020

Description

A bold, textured font with a vintage, handcrafted feel. This font features a rough, textured appearance reminiscent of vintage postmarks. The characters are bold with a slightly distressed look, giving them a unique, handcrafted feel. The rounded edges and consistent stroke width add to its approachable and friendly style.
Ideal for vintage-themed designs, logos, packaging, and posters that require a rustic or handcrafted touch.
Logos, Posters, Packaging
Balanced
Download Postmark-Rough font. Postmark-Rough by Copyright ? 2017 by ramandhani. All rights reserved.

See the font with your own text

Postmark-Rough

Category

Decorative/Display

Italic

No

Width

Normal

Line height

Normal

Overall style

Vintage

Cap height

High

Bold

Yes

Weight

Bold

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

Low

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for vintage-themed designs, logos, packaging, and posters that require a rustic or handcrafted touch.

Use case

Logos, Posters, Packaging

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for Postmark-Rough

Montserrat-Bold

Free for personal use

Trueno Round Bold

Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for Postmark-Rough from Adobe.com

Soleil Extrabold

$ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for Postmark-Rough from MyFonts.com

Versatile Rust Bold

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Bergen Mono Bold

$ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for Postmark-Rough from CreativeMarket.com

Postmark Rough otf (400)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Warlow Sans otf (900)

$ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

WalpurgisNight
9 minutes ago
0 replies (9 minutes ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

berkahundangan
6 hours ago
0 replies (6 hours ago)