Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

ClaudioWings

from Creative Fabrica

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

ClaudioWings

2.79/5

434 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

from Creative Fabrica

License

Commercial

Date added

Oct 08 2022

Description

A cursive, handwritten font with smooth, flowing strokes. This font features a handwritten, cursive style with flowing, connected letters. The strokes are smooth and slightly varied in thickness, giving it a natural and elegant appearance. The characters are slightly slanted, enhancing the script-like quality.
Ideal for wedding invitations, greeting cards, personal branding, and elegant logos.
Logos, Invitations, Personal Branding
Balanced
Download ClaudioWings font. ClaudioWings by Copyright (c) 2021 by MaulanaCreative. All rights reserved.

See the font with your own text

ClaudioWings

Category

Script

Italic

Yes

Width

Normal

Line height

Normal

Overall style

Elegant, Handwritten

Cap height

High

Bold

No

Weight

Regular

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

Medium

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for wedding invitations, greeting cards, personal branding, and elegant logos.

Use case

Logos, Invitations, Personal Branding

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for ClaudioWings

Bellindia Free for personal use
FiolenitaScript Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for ClaudioWings from Adobe.com

Neonoir Slim $ Commercial > Adobe.com
Luxus Brut Regular $ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for ClaudioWings from MyFonts.com

Wollyroots Regular $ Commercial > MyFonts.com
Baekrajan Regular $ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for ClaudioWings from CreativeMarket.com

ClaudioWings otf (400) $ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com
Hillstatic otf (400) $ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

PerefectSchraub
48 minutes ago
0 replies (48 minutes ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

PerefectSchraub
51 minutes ago
0 replies (51 minutes ago)