Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

Brithney Castile Regular

from Creative Fabrica

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

Brithney Castile Regular

2.76/5

255 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

from Creative Fabrica

License

Commercial

Date added

Oct 05 2022

Description

A decorative script font with elegant, flowing lines and a handwritten style. This is a decorative script font with elegant, flowing lines and a handwritten style. The characters have a playful yet sophisticated appearance, featuring smooth curves and varying stroke thicknesses. The uppercase letters are elaborate and ornate, while the lowercase letters maintain a more casual, connected look.
Ideal for wedding invitations, greeting cards, branding, and logo design.
Logos, Invitations, Greeting Cards
Balanced
Download Brithney Castile Regular font. Brithney Castile Regular by

See the font with your own text

Brithney Castile Regular

Category

Script

Italic

No

Width

Normal

Line height

Tall

Overall style

Decorative

Cap height

High

Bold

No

Weight

Regular

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

High

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for wedding invitations, greeting cards, branding, and logo design.

Use case

Logos, Invitations, Greeting Cards

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for Brithney Castile Regular

Brittensy Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for Brithney Castile Regular from Adobe.com

Samantha Upright Regular $ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for Brithney Castile Regular from MyFonts.com

Alianda Script Italic $ Commercial > MyFonts.com
Cimberleigh Regular $ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for Brithney Castile Regular from CreativeMarket.com

BrithneyCastile-Regular otf (400) $ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com
Angel Love Regular otf (400) $ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

sma2787
9 minutes ago
0 replies (9 minutes ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

moshekipod
29 minutes ago
0 replies (29 minutes ago)