Back to all fonts

WhatFontIs All fonts

Love Song JNL Regular

FontSpring.com

fontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreviewfontPreview

Love Song JNL Regular

3.09/5

963 votes, rated based on results identification

Publisher

FontSpring.com

License

Commercial

Date added

Dec 17 2016

Description

Elegant and modern font with thin, elongated strokes and subtle curves. This font features a unique blend of elegance and modernity, with thin, elongated strokes and subtle curves. The uppercase letters are tall and slender, while the lowercase letters maintain a consistent style. The numerals and special characters complement the overall aesthetic with similar design elements.
Ideal for wedding invitations, elegant branding, and high-end product packaging.
Headlines, Logos
Balanced
Download Love Song JNL Regular font. Love Song JNL Regular by Jeff Levine Fonts

See the font with your own text

Love Song JNL Regular

Category

Decorative/Display

Italic

No

Width

Normal

Line height

Tall

Overall style

Modern

Cap height

High

Bold

No

Weight

Regular

Character spacing

Normal

Contrast

High

X height

Medium

Proposed projects

Ideal for wedding invitations, elegant branding, and high-end product packaging.

Use case

Headlines, Logos

Ascender descender ratio

Balanced

Similar Free Fonts for Love Song JNL Regular

Nizza Regular Free for personal use
DKPinkus Free for personal use

Similar Fonts for Love Song JNL Regular from Adobe.com

Farmhand Sans Regular $ Commercial > Adobe.com
Fino Sans Italic $ Commercial > Adobe.com

Similar Fonts for Love Song JNL Regular from MyFonts.com

Love Song JNL $ Commercial > MyFonts.com
Aquus Regular $ Commercial > MyFonts.com

Similar Fonts for Love Song JNL Regular from CreativeMarket.com

Joyeux otf (400) $ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com
The First Division Normal otf (400) $ Commercial > CreativeMarket.com

Latest from the forum

forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

bojana
6 hours ago
0 replies (6 hours ago)
forumPostPreview

Maybe or unanswered

bojana
6 hours ago
0 replies (6 hours ago)